Impact of Time Delay on Thrombus Burden and TIMI-Flow in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention


Authors: Khaled Abdelgaber Abozeid, Ahmed Farouk Alaarag, Timoor Mostafa Abdallah, and Mai Mohamed Salama
Page Range: 157-168
Published in: World Heart Journal, 14#2 (2022)
ISSN: 1556-4002

ISBN: N/A Category:

Table of Contents


Background: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) diagnosis consists of evidence of myocardial injury clinically coping with acute myocardial ischemia. ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) treatment seeks to restore coronary artery blood supply (Reperfusion) as early as possible. As time is crucial in life-saving, limited data are available on the clinical significance of both combined thrombus burden score and TIMI flow score with ischemic time in STEMI patients. Objective: To determine the effect of total ischemia time delay on Thrombus burden and TIMI-flow scores in patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Subjects and methods: After clearance from the ethics committee of the hospital and obtaining written informed consent, patients were recruited in this study. The study included 248 consecutive patients with STEMI, admitted from June 2019 to December 2020, to the Cardiology Department of Tanta University Hospital and Tanta Insurance Hospital, Tanta, Egypt. All volunteers underwent primary PCI within 15 months, which were categorized by total ischemic time (symptom onset to wire crossing time) into three groups. Group 1: 48 patients presented from 0 to 2 hours; Group 2: 80 patients presented from 2 to 6 hours; Group 3: 120 patients presented more than 6 hours. Diagnostic criteria were based on AHA and ESC guidelines. Results: A significant relationship was found between the total ischemic time with initial TIMI flow score, final TIMI flow score, initial Thrombus Burden score and post flow achievement Thrombus Burden Score (TBS) (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The longer the total ischemic time, the higher the thrombus burden score and the lower the TIMI flow score.

Keywords: Thrombus burden, TIMI-Flow, ST-Elevation Myocardial infarction, primary PCI.


[1] Tuppo EE, Trivedi MP, Daevmer J, Cabrera J, Kostis JB, Kostis WJ. Trends in myocardial infarction case fatality in New Jersey 2000-2014. World Heart J 2020; 12 (2): 1-10.
[2] Sánchez DM, Alfonso F. Thrombus burden quantification: an evolving tool for coronary interventions. Interv Cardiol 2017; 9: 67–69.
[3] Hogan AN, Rosenberger R, Fowler RL. Emergency care regionalization. Chapter 72 in Cone DC, Brice JH, Delbridge TR, Myers JB, eds. Emergency Medical Services: Clinical Practice and Systems Oversight. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2021. pp. 32–42. doi: 10.1002/9781119756279.CH72.
[4] Mughal LH, Sastry S. Advances in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction in the UK. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2022;11:20480040221075519. doi: 10.1177/20480040221075519.
[5] Hassan AKM, Mohamed HSE, Mohamed AM, Ahmed TAN, Kishk YT. Predictors of no-reflow in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Thrombus aspiration was protective. Egypt Heart J 2018; 70 (4): 421-426. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2018.07.007.
[6] Thompson SK. Sampling (Google eBook). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2012. p. 472.
[7] Rathod KS, Comer K, Casey-Gillman O, Moore L, Mills G, Ferguson G, Antoniou S, Patel R, Fhadil S, Damani T, Wright P, Ozkor M, Das D, Guttmann OP, Baumbach A, Archbold RA, Wragg A, Jain AK, Choudry FA, Mathur A, Jones DA. Early hospital discharge following PCI for patients with STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 78 (25): 2550-2560. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.1379.
[8] Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimský P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018; 39 (2): 119–177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
[9] Benson LM, Wunderly D, Perry B, Kabboord J, Wenk T, Birdsall B, Vanderbos L, Roach V, Goole R, Crippen C, Nyirenda T, Rumsey L, Manguba G. Determining best practice: Comparison of three methods of femoral sheath removal after cardiac interventional procedures. Heart Lung 2005; 34 (2): 115-121. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.06.011.
[10] Wong GC, Welsford M, Ainsworth C, Abuzeid W, Fordyce CB, Greene J, Huynh T, Lambert L, Le May M, Lutchmedial S, Mehta SR, Natarajan M, Norris CM, Overgaard CB, Perry Arnesen M, Quraishi A, Tanguay JF, Traboulsi M, van Diepen S, Welsh R, Wood DA, Cantor WJ; members of the Secondary Panel. 2019 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology Guidelines on the Acute Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Focused Update on Regionalization and Reperfusion. Can J Cardiol 2019; 35 (2): 107-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.11.031.
[11] Coghill EM, Johnson T, Morris RE, Megson IL, Leslie SJ. Radial artery access site complications during cardiac procedures, clinical implications and potential solutions: The role of nitric oxide. World J Cardiol 2020; 12 (1): 26-34. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i1.26.
[12] Sarkar A, Grigg WS, Lee JJ. TIMI Grade Flow, StatPearls, May 2021.
[13] Allencherril J, Jneid H, Atar D, Alam M, Levine G, Kloner RA, Birnbaum Y. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of the no-reflow phenomenon. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2019; 33 (5): 589-597. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06901-0.
[14] Tanboga IH, Topcu S, Aksakal E, Kalkan K, Sevimli S, Acikel M. Determinants of angiographic thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2014; 20 (7): 716-722. doi: 10.1177/1076029613483169.
[15] Abacioglu OO, Yildirim A, Karadeniz M, Abacioglu S, Koyunsever NY, Dindas F, Dogdus M, Kaplangoray M. A new score for determining thrombus burden in STEMI patients: the MAPH score. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2022; 28: 10760296211073767. doi: 10.1177/10760296211073767.
[16] de Boer SP, Barnes EH, Westerhout CM, Simes RJ, Granger CB, Kastrati A, Widimsky P, de Boer MJ, Zijlstra F, Boersma E. High-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction derive greatest absolute benefit from primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from the Primary Coronary Angioplasty Trialist versus Thrombolysis (PCAT)-2 Collaboration. Am Heart J 2011; 161 (3): 500-507.e1. doi: 10.1016/J.AHJ.2010.11.022.
[17] Yip HK, Chen MC, Chang HW, Hang CL, Hsieh YK, Fang CY, Wu CJ. Angiographic morphologic features of infarct-related arteries and timely reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: Predictors of slow-flow and no-reflow phenomenon. Chest 2002; 122 (4): 1322-1332. doi: 10.1378/chest.122.4.1322.
[18] O’Connor CT, Maguire C, Abdalla A, Buckley A, Kumar J, Cahill C, Ahearne C, Al Maini M, Hennessy T, Arnous S, Kiernan T. The factors influencing total ischaemic time in patients presenting with STEMI in an Irish tertiary referral centre. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (Supplement 1): P951. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0545.
[19] Ting HH, Bradley EH, Wang Y, Lichtman JH, Nallamothu BK, Sullivan MD, Gersh BJ, Roger VL, Curtis JP, Krumholz HM. Factors associated with longer time from symptom onset to hospital presentation for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168 (9): 959-968. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.9.959.
[20] Shiomi H, Nakagawa Y, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Nakano A, Shirai S, Taniguchi R, Yamaji K, Nagao K, Suyama T, Mitsuoka H, Araki M, Takashima H, Mizoguchi T, Eisawa H, Sugiyama S, Kimura T; CREDO-Kyoto AMI investigators. Association of onset to balloon and door to balloon time with long term clinical outcome in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction having primary percutaneous coronary intervention: observational study. BMJ 2012; 344: e3257. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3257.
[21] Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, Vaina S, van Mieghem CA, van Domburg RT, Michalis LK, Serruys PW. Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The importance of thrombus burden. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50 (7): 573-583. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.059.
[22] Ahmed TA, Sorgdrager BJ, Cannegieter SC, van der Laarse A, Schalij MJ, Jukema W. Pre-infarction angina predicts thrombus burden in patients admitted for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Euro Intervention 2012; 7 (12): 1396-1405. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I12A219.
[23] Radwan HI, Samak MR, Farag ESM, Eldeeb MEAE, Predictors of occurrence and recovery of left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty. World Heart J 2020; 12 (3): 233-247.
[24] Mazhar J, Mashicharan M, Farshid A. Predictors and outcome of no-reflow post primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2015; 10: 8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.11.002.
[25] Liang T, Liu M, Wu C, Zhang Q, Lu L, Wang Z. Risk factors for no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Rev Invest Clin 2017; 69 (3): 139-145. doi: 10.24875/RIC.17002190.