Farhad Malekian – Uppsala, Sweden

Series: Law, Crime and Law Enforcement; Laws and Legislation
BISAC: LAW026000; LAW051000; LAW052000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52305/GQDW7245

The philosophy of being righteous essentially sustains our existence and questions the sphere of morality in man. This philosophy reaches the colossal connotation of the royal essence of our natural virtue, if it exists, and can then be inserted into the soul of all international human rights and criminal conventions. No matter what we include in our arguments and reasonings in relation to the content of justice itself, it is the sugar-coated perception of the improper use of our obligations that undermines its major philosophy. All divisive interpretations of the nature of rights and justice ultimately reveal how fragile the ecosphere of our human rights is and why there is a lack of criminal accountability for those who commit core international crimes. The truth is that justice is served without using any metaphysics of categorical righteousness. Consequently, the axiomatic merit of justice remains conceptually indistinct, as it cannot face the noble spirit of the forum of humanity. Justice becomes a simple metaphor. The very merits of being righteous weaken, and the actual notions of cruel injustice increase. This is not my assumption, nor is it the judgment of national or international courts—it has been proven and witnessed.  We will see that those major and invaluable provisions of justice have been recycled “in the name of humanity” to slaughter millions in order to gain control of their resources.

**Order the printed version and SAVE 50% on the e-book with Print+eBook**