Human Dynamics: Multidisciplinary Complexity Science – Information Page
Ecosystems, the human psyche-soma, ant colonies, the Internet, and economic networks are all complex systems displaying collective behavior and emergence beyond the sum of their parts. Complexity science systematically investigates these emergent phenomena and stretches across and beyond disciplines. Human Dynamics: Multidisciplinary Complexity Science is a series of topical volumes that provides an authoritative source for understanding and applying the concepts, tools, and measures of complexity theory for analyzing complex systems in all fields of science with a particular focus on human dynamics. Many phenomena at all scales in science have the characteristics of complex systems. They can be fully understood only through the transdisciplinary perspectives, theories, and tools of self-organization, synergetics, dynamical systems, turbulence, catastrophes, instabilities, nonlinearity, stochastic processes, chaos, neural networks, cellular automata, adaptive systems, genetic algorithms, quantum theories, and so on. All these seemingly diverse phenomena and structure formations have essential features and underlying structures in common. These profound structural similarities can be exploited to transfer or translate analytical methods and understanding from one field to another. This unique work will extend the influence of complexity and system science to a broader audience.
Franco F Orsucci
University College London, UK
Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, UK
Institute for Complexity Studies & Mind Force Society, Rome, Italy
Institute for Complexity Studies, Rome, Italy
CERFIM – Research Center for Mathematics and Physics, Locarno, Switzerland
ISSI – Institute of Scientific and Interdisciplinary Studies, Locarno, Switzerland
Frederick D Abraham, Blueberry Brain Institute, VA, USA
Joanna Baines, Norfolk & Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, UK
Elio Conte, University of Bari, Italy
Giulio De Felice, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Liane Gabora, University of British Columbia, Canada
Omar Gelo, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
Alessandro Giuliani, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
Miran Možina, Sigmund Freud University, Slovenia
Paul Peluso, Florida Atlantic University, Miami, USA
Laurent Pezard, Universite’ Renee Descartes, France
Felicitas Rost, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Sergio Salvatore, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy
Günter Schiepek, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
Gabriele Serafini, Cusano University, Rome, Italy
Wolfgang Tschacher, University of Basel, Switzerland
Chuck Webber, Loyola University, Chicago, USA
NOTES FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Human Dynamics: Multidisciplinary Complexity Science is a peer-reviewed book series owned and operated by Nova Science Publishers and funded entirely by purchase orders and author-optional publication services. Each installment of the book series is available in print and electronic formats and sent to all the major index houses for evaluation.
There is no charge to submit or publish your work in the book series. Nova offers a number of optional publication services that carry fees, but authors are not required to select these services, and the services won’t be offered until after acceptance of your work. These services include Open Access, color printing, chapter offprints, discounted print copies, and licenses for use of the published chapters.
Authors may deposit and display the accepted versions of their work in and on their personal non-commercial and affiliate non-commercial repositories and websites at any time. The same may be done with their final published works only after a period of one year has elapsed from the day of publication. Authors may obtain reproduction and republication rights for their chapters by transacting with Copyright Clearance Center or with Nova directly.
Before submitting your work, please read the complete notes and instructions below to ensure that you understand Nova’s manuscript requirements and publication procedures and that you are in compliance with the ethical standards rightfully set forth by Nova, the publishing industry, and the scientific community.
Submission of a manuscript must be accompanied by a signed Copyright Transfer and Disclosure Form, which can be printed or downloaded here: https://novapublishers.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/CTDF-Copyright-Transfer-and-Disclosure-Form.pdf. Submissions that do not include a signed Copyright Transfer and Disclosure Form will be treated as incomplete.
Chapters should be submitted by email to one of the Editors listed below.
Franco F. Orsucci
University College London & NCU
Institute for Complexity Studies
It is understood that works submitted to the book series have not been submitted elsewhere for simultaneous publication consideration and have not been previously published, in whole or in part, unless the new work is an expansion of the original, in which case full transparency of the re-used portions must be provided. Please note that your work cannot be retracted or withdrawn after it has been published.
It is important that all authors and organizations where the research has been carried out have consented to the work’s submission and that all authors have significantly contributed.
The following types of papers are accepted for publication consideration in the book series.
News and Ideas
These should be original works describing scientific results.
1. It is the report of a study written by the researchers who did the study.
2. The researchers describe their hypothesis or research question and the purpose of the study.
3. The researchers detail their research methods.
4. The results of the research are reported.
5. The researchers interpret their results and discuss possible implications.
The major subdivisions that should be present in a research work: Literature Review or Background; Methods; Results; Conclusions; Discussion. The abstract of the work usually contains these subdivision headings and summarizes each of them.
Original papers should be limited to 15,000 words.
Reviews summarize the current state of understanding on a topic. Reviews survey and summarize previously published studies, rather than reporting new findings, facts, or analyses. Reviews focus on: main people working in a field; recent major advances and discoveries; significant gaps in the research; current debates; ideas of where research might go next. We would consider proposals of literature reviews, systematic reviews, and metanalyses. Reviews should not exceed 15,000 words. Authors of review papers are encouraged to contact one of the Editors in advance.
News and Ideas
Suggestions for applications of new ideas or methodologies are welcome.
Contributions should not exceed 3,000 words in length.
Software and Algorithms
Include any of the following:
1) Interactive processes, such as SGI and JAVA.
2) Program packages.
3) Algorithms as demonstrations of new computational ideas and techniques.
Submission of these should be accompanied by: a description of the aims, methods, and implementation; documentation to allow users to install and run the software; some data, scripts, or any other material to provide a demonstration of the software in use, and; arrangements regarding availability. Authors should contact one of the Editors before submission.
Includes lectures, tutorials, and other educational material. Authors should contact one of the Editors before submission.
Creative papers on analogical suggestions coming from the arts and the social sciences. Authors should contact one of the Editors before submission.
Samples of any kind of raw original data (e.g., time series, etc.) that could be offered, accompanied by detailed explicative notes, to the scientific community to compare differences. Authors should contact one of the Editors before submission.
1. Submission of paper.
2. Editorial office assessment.
3. Appraisal by the editor.
4. Invitation to reviewers.
5. Response to invitations.
6. Review is conducted.
7. Review is evaluated.
8. The decision is communicated within six to eight weeks.
The book series uses double-blind peer-review. The identities of both reviewers and authors are concealed from each other throughout the review. To facilitate this, authors must ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in such a way that they do not reveal their identities to reviewers, either directly or indirectly. Please therefore ensure that the following items are present in your submission and provided as separate files.
– Anonymized Manuscript
– Title Page
Please remove any identifying information, such as authors’ names or affiliations, from your manuscript before submission. As well as removing names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, other steps need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double blind peer review. The key points to consider are:
Use the third person to refer to work the authors have previously published. For example, write “Black and Hart (2015) have previously demonstrated” rather than “we/the authors have previously demonstrated (Black & Hart, 2015).”
Make sure that figures and tables do not contain any reference to author affiliations.
Choose file names with care, and ensure that the file’s “properties” are also anonymised. If you are using Office 2007 or later, consider using the Document Inspector Tool prior to submission.
The Title Page will remain separate from the manuscript throughout the peer-review process and will not be sent to the reviewers. The Title Page should include:
– The manuscript title
– All authors’ complete names and complete affiliations
– A complete address for the corresponding author, including an e-mail address
Publication Ethics and Research Conduct
Nova and its editors are committed to maintaining trust in our published content, the value of authorship, and the integrity of science. Authors should be eager to help us maintain these standards. Guidelines for transparency are provided below to help authors avoid the appearance of ethical misconduct in their research and to help ensure adherence to the best practices set forth by national and international professional and regulatory bodies.
Plagiarism is a blight on the scientific community and a crime. The unauthorized use or close imitation of another’s language, text, data, ideas, or theories is prohibited. In all instances of authorized use, full credit to and representation of the original author’s work must be provided. It is the authors’ responsibility to secure permission for the use of copyrighted material.
Nova will use CrossCheck and/or other software to screen manuscripts for plagiarism and will investigate all reports and suspicions of plagiarism. Authors suspected of plagiaristic misconduct will be contacted and given the opportunity to prove the validity of their work and refute the allegations. All instances of proven plagiarism will be reported to the Publisher, the editorial office, the author’s institute, and other governing bodies as necessary. Plagiarized works already accepted for publication will be cancelled, and plagiarized works that have already been published will be retracted and denounced in a public erratum.
In order to establish transparency in your research, authors must be sure to provide statements on the following items.
1) Information regarding the source(s) of the work’s funding;
2) All financial and non-financial potential conflicts of interest;
3) A statement of informed consent for all studies that involve human participants;
4) A statement of human rights for all studies that involve human participants;
5) A statement on the humane treatment and proper welfare of all animals involved in the study.
The appropriate statements are provided below. They should be included in the manuscript’s text in a section titled Ethical Compliance. This section should immediately precede the References section.
1) Sources of Funding
Please provide the names of all funding agencies, research grants, and grant numbers.
Source of Funding: This study was funded by ____________________.
2) Potential Conflicts of Interest
Authors are required to disclose all personal and professional relationships and interests that can be viewed as potentially imparting bias in the work. Readers are entitled to this information and to their own conclusions and perceptions of conflict. Potential conflicts could be financial relationships, employment, sponsorships, public holdings, competing interests, spousal interests, personal relationships, personal beliefs, etc.
Possible or perceived conflicts of interest among peer reviewers are handled by the Editors. A request for the reviewer to disclose all possible or perceived conflicts of interest will be included with all invitations for peer-review. When possible or perceived conflicts of interest are present, peer reviewers are expected to recuse themselves. When editors, editorial board members, and other members of the editorial team have possible or perceived conflicts of interests with content that is submitted to them, they should recuse themselves and reassign their tasks to other capable members. If possible or perceived conflict of interest cannot be avoided by reassignment, it should be suggested to the submitting author that he/she submit to a different publication.
The Committee on Publication Ethics provides guidelines for investigating the suspected non-disclosure of conflicts of interest.
a) Disclosure of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
b) Disclosure of Interest:
3) Informed Consent
Study participants have the right to decide how the identifiable personal information gathered on them is used. It is essential that all participants (or guardians) give their written informed consent to participate in the study and its subsequent publication.
Informed consent was obtained from each individual participant involved in this study.
4) Statement of Human Rights
The wellbeing of human subjects takes precedence over the interests of science. If a study involves human participants, authors must include a statement to assure us that the study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.
This study was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.
5) Statement of Animal Welfare
All studies that involve animals must contain a statement to assure us that the study and its procedures were approved by their affiliate institutional research ethics committees.
All animals involved in this study were treated in accordance with the ethical standards set forth by the institution at which the study was conducted.
Committee on Publication Ethics
Nova and its editors follow the Codes of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). These codes and guidelines are valuable instructions that ensure transparency and fairness in research and publishing. The single document provides steps for submissions, peer-review, confidentiality, the creation and maintenance of editorial boards, editorial responsibilities and decision-making, communication policy, appeal procedures, handling complaints and instances of misconduct, quality assurance, publishing corrections and retractions, adherence to national and international ethics guidelines, and many more aspects of the publication process.
The COPE Codes of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines can be read at the link below. We recommend your familiarity with them while you conduct your research and publish with Nova and any other scientific publisher.
If you notice any ethical misconduct in Nova’s publications, please contact us.
Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
415 Oser Avenue, Suite N
Hauppauge, New York 11788, USA
Phone: (631) 231-7269
Please contact our office using the information above.
The series content is preserved electronically to ensure that access can continue in perpetuity if the series ceases publication. Nova will comply with NISO standards in the event of transfer between publishers.